3 ms·
I think the distinction is -> if I threaten you by planting drugs on you, which I am not legally meant to do, then I am extrorting you as I took the initiative.
by ClumsyPilot 4y ago
I think the distinction is -> if I threaten you by planting drugs on you, which I am not legally meant to do, then I am extrorting you as I took the initiative.
If you are the one that was doing something illegal to begin with, and bribe an official to keep it under wraps, then it's on you.
- antasvara 4y agoI agree with the general sentiment here. Initiative is what ultimately matters. I would question which direction the initiative is with respect to ESG ratings. If an ESG rating agency is publicly or privately showing exactly how certain factors are weighted, I would argue that the initiative is with the agency.