3 ms·

no individual landlords? no corporate landlords? What kind of “landlords” then? Just don’t suggest some type of “communal/socialist” housing. Been there (ussr)

by option 4y ago

no individual landlords? no corporate landlords? What kind of “landlords” then? Just don’t suggest some type of “communal/socialist” housing. Been there (ussr) - f#*%k that and everything related to it.

ClumsyPilot 4y ago
> Just don’t suggest some type of “communal/socialist” housing. Been there (ussr) - f#*%k that and everything related to it. is this the ususal government=Communal=socialist=communist brain bug? They are totally different things! UK has social housing managed by local government, it's been very succesfull and desirable. Communal apartments are a type of buildding. Community housing might is 'normal' housing run by an independant charity, you are not against individual people running charities, are you? Cohousing is a community of independant houses built around a shared space, that originated in denmark. Which one are you railing agianst here? Also why should someone be 'investing' in newbuild Apartments they won't live in, what value does that bring to the economy? They are not contributing anything other than speculation.
- option 4y ago
  >> why should someone be 'investing' in newbuild Apartments they won't live in, what value does that bring to the economy? it funds their construction and land acquisition
  - ClumsyPilot 4y ago
    So does selling the apartment to future homeowners, which can be boosted by providing mortgages to young families. If the company needs finance it can produce corporate bonds, taking out loans, the state could provide funding, etc. What is the basis for claiming any more funding is required for their construction and aquisition? This 'investment' only drives up real estate prices, and as a result ever more money will be required for future land aquisitions. It is literally a system that easts itself.

3 ms·

no individual landlords? no corporate landlords? What kind of “landlords” then? Just don’t suggest some type of “communal/socialist” housing. Been there (ussr)

by option 4y ago

ClumsyPilot 4y ago
> Just don’t suggest some type of “communal/socialist” housing. Been there (ussr) - f#*%k that and everything related to it. is this the ususal government=Communal=socialist=communist brain bug? They are totally different things! UK has social housing managed by local government, it's been very succesfull and desirable. Communal apartments are a type of buildding. Community housing might is 'normal' housing run by an independant charity, you are not against individual people running charities, are you? Cohousing is a community of independant houses built around a shared space, that originated in denmark. Which one are you railing agianst here? Also why should someone be 'investing' in newbuild Apartments they won't live in, what value does that bring to the economy? They are not contributing anything other than speculation.
- option 4y ago
  >> why should someone be 'investing' in newbuild Apartments they won't live in, what value does that bring to the economy? it funds their construction and land acquisition
  - ClumsyPilot 4y ago
    So does selling the apartment to future homeowners, which can be boosted by providing mortgages to young families. If the company needs finance it can produce corporate bonds, taking out loans, the state could provide funding, etc. What is the basis for claiming any more funding is required for their construction and aquisition? This 'investment' only drives up real estate prices, and as a result ever more money will be required for future land aquisitions. It is literally a system that easts itself.