I'm trying to be civil, but you keep making statements about the paper that are objectively not correct. Fig. 2(B) does not show "second stage cases (mostly rep

I'm trying to be civil, but you keep making statements about the paper that are objectively not correct. Fig. 2(B) does not show "second stage cases (mostly reported around January and February)" as you posted earlier. The map from the Weibo analysis is not shown in the paper, so one can't "put[] the maps side by side". Moreover, it's irrelevant to claim that a Weibo analysis of second stage cases not shown in the paper is relevant to the interpretation of figures in the paper that are not limited to second stage cases.