2 ms·
I am suddenly reminded of the sealion Wondermark (http://wondermark.com/1k62/ http://wondermark.com/1k62/). Anyway, "tech" was absolutely not built with group
by mcguire 4y ago
I am suddenly reminded of the sealion Wondermark (http://wondermark.com/1k62/ http://wondermark.com/1k62/).
Anyway, "tech" was absolutely not built with group conversations, discussions, and debates. Debates are just ways to show off how smart you are. Tech was mostly built by people who went and did things, and if you didn't like what they were doing, you could either comply or leave. Which they discovered was a great way to get things done.
So then they expanded that to every other possible realm which is why you have to "fit the culture" to work in tech. And why we're having this discussion.
- devmunchies 4y agobut these innovators were rejecting the broader norms of the time. On the whole, renegades were rewarded by the market. there was definitely a lot of back and forth innovation. I see your point though and perhaps debate is the wrong term, more like freedom to blaze your own path and challenge strongly help positions.