4 ms·
Fair enough, but approaching the problem rationally, is that really how we should measure success? Are you satisfied with a solution that results in objectivel
by hcurtiss 4y ago
Fair enough, but approaching the problem rationally, is that really how we should measure success? Are you satisfied with a solution that results in objectively more death just because you claim to have some part in creating it? That strikes me as ridiculous, and the outcome is that we're holding autonomous driving to an impossible standard.
- RhysU 4y agoThought experiments! Cancer is cured but 99% of its death toll is replaced by wholly random spontaneous human combustion. Is that better? What if it wasn't purely random but instead the chance of your spontaneous combustion slightly depended on if your socks are worn? Is that better? I posit both suck.
- hcurtiss 4y agoThe difference here, I think, is that you don’t have to use autonomous drivers. To the contrary, notwithstanding laws against it, you do have to share the road with distracted and drunk drivers.