6 ms·
> Doesn't rampantly falsify data, yes. Completely above board and trustworthy, no. the 2 are equivalent given context, no?
by rob_c 4y ago
> Doesn't rampantly falsify data, yes. Completely above board and trustworthy, no.
the 2 are equivalent given context, no?
- lern_too_spel 4y agoNo. They were fined for doing things like recommending off-label use for their drugs, and they provided no data to support that off-label use. That isn't falsifying data, but that isn't acting trustworthy either.
- rob_c 4y agoFined for being inscrupulous but are not unscrupulous... Ok I think I understand the faith.
- lern_too_spel 4y agoYou very clearly don't understand. I said they aren't completely trustworthy and I never implied they are.
- rob_c 4y agoThen why make the comparison if it's not needed. It is enough to state one thing without comparing it needlessly to another.
- lern_too_spel 4y agoYou're the one who needlessly and wrongly conflated not falsifying data with being completely above board and trustworthy. I've been trying to get through to you this whole thread that the two are not equivalent.
- rob_c 4y agoyou only need to state don't feed the troll instead of feeding the troll