3 ms·
Its weird to have an article about the dangers of editing that doesn't clearly identify what the dangerous edit was. Seems like the hand wringing was about a s
by cwkoss 4y ago
Its weird to have an article about the dangers of editing that doesn't clearly identify what the dangerous edit was. Seems like the hand wringing was about a scene the article-author incorrectly said was edited, so the article updated, but now the article is an empty shell of criticism without substance.
- bigtones 4y agoCould that same criticism not also be applied to this very news article that was retroactively edited or 'George Lucased' as the writer refers to it as.
- madrox 4y agoThis is the real story, but not a new one
- thaumasiotes 4y agoNo, because the article admits to the change: > Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that a season one episode of Stranger Things had been edited retroactively to remove a shot of Jonathan photographing Nancy while she was changing.