4 ms·
I had to go back and dig up a D700 photo. https://www.flickr.com/photos/perardi/8836490860/in/album-72157633702028088/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/perardi/88
by perardi 4y ago
I had to go back and dig up a D700 photo.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/perardi/8836490860/in/album-72157633702028088/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/perardi/8836490860/in/album-72...
Yup. Image quality holds up!
…OK, that’s not entirely fair. It’s more that the image quality of the absurdly expensive lens I rented for that weekend holds up.
https://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/af-s-nikkor-300mm-f2.8g-ed-vr-ii.html https://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-le...
- hef19898 4y agoPutting 1k bucks in a lense is such better investment than putting the same in a camera body when it comes to image quality. Another benefit of a low resolution body, lenses don't need to be as absurdly good as they have to be for 24/66 MP plus bodies abd are correspondingly cheaper. Which leaves more money to travel to all those nice places to take nice pictures and enjoy yourself. Not that I would say no to Z9 with corresponding glass if someone gave it to me!
- someweirdperson 4y ago> Putting 1k bucks in a lense [...] The one linked by the parent is $5.5k.
- hef19898 4y agoI saw that... 1k is a lens I look at sometimes twice per day... Well chirstmas is coming, slowly but surely...