3 ms·
Speaking generally, every single time a new study is discussed on HN, the first comment talks about how it doesn't do what it is supposed to. For e.g., a topic
by systemvoltage 4y ago
Speaking generally, every single time a new study is discussed on HN, the first comment talks about how it doesn't do what it is supposed to. For e.g., a topic about "X cures cancer" has a comment that's at the very top that claims "No, X doesn't cure cancer, except in these narrow cases" and then sources the details in the paper.
That seems to me the right thing to do. HN does that very well.
- mikeyouse 4y agoIf you read closer, you'll notice that it's not at all what is happening here. Maybe 1/10th of the comments are about the actual paper? Fewer? It's just mindless evidence-free conspiracy mongering including fun little subthreads about how you can't rule out that the US actually created the pandemic to punish China; https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32252553 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32252553
- systemvoltage 4y agoWe are talking past each other. I’m speaking more generally since you’re talking about this entire community. But you have just this thread to point for an example.