3 ms·
Your comment is orthogonal to the parent's comment and there's no reason to assign malice to the commenter. It's quite plausible that the CCP is lying and the
by ARandomerDude 4y ago
Your comment is orthogonal to the parent's comment and there's no reason to assign malice to the commenter.
It's quite plausible that the CCP is lying and the paper authors are honest about their findings. The problem is the analysis is only as good as the inputs. From the article:
> "Chinese government notified the World Health Organization (WHO) of an outbreak of severe pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan...after careful examination of reported case histories..."
Note that:
1. The CCP claims the virus was unknown to them.
2. The CCP is in charge of what case histories are analyzed, and can carefully select those which point away from the lab leak.