3 ms·
I think the Beatles situation has to do with Michael Jackson having owned the Beatles catalogue for a time then Paul Mcartney bought it back (I think?). I'd sta
by billpatrianakos 15y ago
I think the Beatles situation has to do with Michael Jackson having owned the Beatles catalogue for a time then Paul Mcartney bought it back (I think?). I'd start your search with that in mind.
Also, the Beatles are on Apple Records which was/is their own label (but still under the umbrella of another label, possibly Columbia, I think).
My broad strokes are correct but the details are questionable. I'm a big Beatles fan so I had to take a stab at answering your question. Keep those facts in mind on your search for answers.
- dpark 15y agoPretty sure McCartney was never able to purchase the catalog from Jackson.
- Hari_Seldon 15y agoAFAIK. Michael Jackson owned the publishing rights to the Beatles songs, not the Beatles recordings. Basically the sheet music rights, royalties when Beatles songs are played on a jukebox or the radio or someone does a cover version of a Beatles tune. It's a complicated arrangement, When in 1989 Paul McCartney wanted to print the lyrics to Eleanor Rigby and other songs for a tour, he discovered he'd have to pay a fee to Michael Jackson.