5 ms·
The big difference, is FOAM notes are meant to be flat (or you can use folder I guess) and you explore just via the links whereas Dendrons have hierarchies of n
by maximus-decimus 4y ago
The big difference, is FOAM notes are meant to be flat (or you can use folder I guess) and you explore just via the links whereas Dendrons have hierarchies of notes.
So "food" is a note about food in general, "food.chinese" is a note under food that's about chineses food, "food.chinese.tao-chicken" is a note about tao-chicken under chinese-food, etc.
You can also just skip notes in the hierarchy, so you could have just "food" and "food.chinese.tao-chicken" and a placeholder "food.chinese" would appear in the graph.
I personally really liked the note/subnote model used in Zim Wiki, but that program wasn't great for code snippets or to write graphs so I'm pretty excited about Dendron. In comparison, trying to connect my notes is just such a pain with a flat system like foam and Obsidian.
- platz 4y agoin what way is Obsidian a "flat" system? It has folders, no? Or did you mean something else?
- maximus-decimus 4y agoYour notes are not under other notes in Obsidian, just inside a folder. Also files in a same folder doesn't affect the graph in any way. The the graph it all looks flat and notes are linked only by the links you explicitly wrote. In comparison, Dendron graphs shows both explicit connections, but also the parents/children.