Can anyone entertain an examination of the fact that, in the current political environment, jokes about marginalized groups is what's considered problematic in

Can anyone entertain an examination of the fact that, in the current political environment, jokes about marginalized groups is what's considered problematic in a game whose premise is organized crime and murder ? I can't.. let me be clear, I love violence in videogames, I love dark, unpleasant, gritty stuff, I love GTA5, so I'm not arguing against the idea of a GTA game.. But if we're going to take the content of the games seriously, it strikes me as impossible, without the conclusion being that.. If we can't include offensive _JOKES_ in a game, but can still allow murdering and criminal behavior.. That means that jokes are worse than murder and crime.. and so, wtf.. In contrast there are games that self-censor rational ways.. For instance FPS games that do not allow you to shoot children, well, that is consistent with drawing a line on a linear scale of what's worse.. They're saying "it's pretty deranged to shoot adults people, but it's WORSE to shoot children, and we're not having that in the game." In constrast, a game self-censoring on jokes is saying "it's pretty bad to shoot adults, but it's worse to joke about someones sexuality" which.. well, they're both bad things.. but in my opinion, murdering someone is worse than running the risk of hurting their feeling with a bad joke..