11 ms·

More like "life is short have an antibiotic resistant Chlamydia".

by FullStackAda 4y ago

collegeburner 4y ago
- gambiting 4y ago
  Wait, what? What kind of insane suggestion is that? No one actively wants to catch a disease. And the health system should help not dispense moral judgement. Otherwise what I'm going to immediately ask is why provide help for people who smoke? Who drink? Who get into an accident when cycling or paragliding? Surely they were all just asking for it! >>or at least make them pay for inpatient treatment so they can't do half the course and stop I don't see how that follows.
  - collegeburner 4y ago
    - hiptobecubic 4y ago
      Smoking is costing us more than aids and monkeypox, I'm sure.
      - collegeburner 4y ago
        yeah thats why i said we shouldn't be paying for them neither and working on social pressures against that behavior. but some how condemning recklessly promiscuous behavior isn't ok b because it's not pc or whatever.
        gambiting 4y ago
        >>some how condemning recklessly promiscuous behavior isn't ok b because it's not pc or whatever. It's not about being PC you crumpet, it's about having a shred of human empathy. You can practice safe sex and still get any of those diseases, having them is not a proof you weren't careful or that you were taking unnecessary risks.
        collegeburner 4y ago
        > you can practice safe sex and still get any of those diseases having sex with like 10 ppl in a weekend is never safe sex. i don't care what protections u think are helpful. the reason those diseases get spread into the general population is bc some ppl are stupid promiscuous and not safe. there should be consequences for that. nobody needs to sleep around that much so no i don't have a lot of empathy for it. literally pick 1 person for a while and stick to them that will fix most of it.
    - gambiting 4y ago
      >> they deserve some kind of punishment for imposing a fucking massive externality on the rest of us. Hope you never get to a hospital only for some internet edgelord to say that you deserve a punishment and no treatment for you. >>see how promiscuous ppl spread aids, now monkeypox. Ah yes, promiscous people, the bane of human society. Is this coming from a religious angle, or just being judgamental in general?
      - collegeburner 4y ago
        gee i guess you missed the past months of ppl saying shit like "if you didn't get vaxxed then u shouldn't get hospital treatment". which is fine i don't rly disagree. i'm only after promiscuous ppl here because they're causing antibiotic resistance in some pretty disgusting conditions and spreading new shit like monkeypox. y'all can't argue not wearing a mask should be punished unless u want to argue not wearing a condom also should be.
        gambiting 4y ago
        >>y'all can't argue not wearing a mask should be punished unless u want to argue not wearing a condom also should be. That some ridiculously dishonest take on the whole issue. Especially monkeypox isn't really prevented by condoms the same way HIV or chlamydia is. >> i'm only after promiscuous ppl here because they're causing antibiotic resistance in some pretty disgusting conditions and spreading new shit like monkeypox You just sound like the people from Reagan era(tbh there are people like this nowadays too) who kept on saying that if it only wasn't for those filthy promiscuous gay people having their disgusting gay sex, AIDS wouldn't be a problem! Think about all the money this is going to cost the public taxpayer! In fact there were people suggesting not treating any HIV positive people, to discourage people from being promiscous! Just....keep your insane moral judgements out of my healthcare please.
        collegeburner 4y ago
- tainto 4y ago
  I honestly wonder how someone can be such an idiot. How would you go about limiting antibiotics to those with an STI? Would you limit them if it were a case of rape? If not, then how would you prove it? The most common communicable bacterial STIs can be treated with single dose regimens, so why don't you do some cursory research before disseminating your shit takes. Use your brain for once, because you're acting like an utter moron. And maybe try to type out normal English. You can't be so lazy as to not be able to type out "you".

More like "life is short have an antibiotic resistant Chlamydia".

collegeburner 4y ago

gambiting 4y ago
Wait, what? What kind of insane suggestion is that? No one actively wants to catch a disease. And the health system should help not dispense moral judgement. Otherwise what I'm going to immediately ask is why provide help for people who smoke? Who drink? Who get into an accident when cycling or paragliding? Surely they were all just asking for it! >>or at least make them pay for inpatient treatment so they can't do half the course and stop I don't see how that follows.
- collegeburner 4y ago
  - hiptobecubic 4y ago
    Smoking is costing us more than aids and monkeypox, I'm sure.
    - collegeburner 4y ago
      yeah thats why i said we shouldn't be paying for them neither and working on social pressures against that behavior. but some how condemning recklessly promiscuous behavior isn't ok b because it's not pc or whatever.
      - gambiting 4y ago
        >>some how condemning recklessly promiscuous behavior isn't ok b because it's not pc or whatever. It's not about being PC you crumpet, it's about having a shred of human empathy. You can practice safe sex and still get any of those diseases, having them is not a proof you weren't careful or that you were taking unnecessary risks.
        collegeburner 4y ago
        > you can practice safe sex and still get any of those diseases having sex with like 10 ppl in a weekend is never safe sex. i don't care what protections u think are helpful. the reason those diseases get spread into the general population is bc some ppl are stupid promiscuous and not safe. there should be consequences for that. nobody needs to sleep around that much so no i don't have a lot of empathy for it. literally pick 1 person for a while and stick to them that will fix most of it.
  - gambiting 4y ago
    >> they deserve some kind of punishment for imposing a fucking massive externality on the rest of us. Hope you never get to a hospital only for some internet edgelord to say that you deserve a punishment and no treatment for you. >>see how promiscuous ppl spread aids, now monkeypox. Ah yes, promiscous people, the bane of human society. Is this coming from a religious angle, or just being judgamental in general?
    - collegeburner 4y ago
      gee i guess you missed the past months of ppl saying shit like "if you didn't get vaxxed then u shouldn't get hospital treatment". which is fine i don't rly disagree. i'm only after promiscuous ppl here because they're causing antibiotic resistance in some pretty disgusting conditions and spreading new shit like monkeypox. y'all can't argue not wearing a mask should be punished unless u want to argue not wearing a condom also should be.
      - gambiting 4y ago
        >>y'all can't argue not wearing a mask should be punished unless u want to argue not wearing a condom also should be. That some ridiculously dishonest take on the whole issue. Especially monkeypox isn't really prevented by condoms the same way HIV or chlamydia is. >> i'm only after promiscuous ppl here because they're causing antibiotic resistance in some pretty disgusting conditions and spreading new shit like monkeypox You just sound like the people from Reagan era(tbh there are people like this nowadays too) who kept on saying that if it only wasn't for those filthy promiscuous gay people having their disgusting gay sex, AIDS wouldn't be a problem! Think about all the money this is going to cost the public taxpayer! In fact there were people suggesting not treating any HIV positive people, to discourage people from being promiscous! Just....keep your insane moral judgements out of my healthcare please.
        collegeburner 4y ago
tainto 4y ago
I honestly wonder how someone can be such an idiot. How would you go about limiting antibiotics to those with an STI? Would you limit them if it were a case of rape? If not, then how would you prove it? The most common communicable bacterial STIs can be treated with single dose regimens, so why don't you do some cursory research before disseminating your shit takes. Use your brain for once, because you're acting like an utter moron. And maybe try to type out normal English. You can't be so lazy as to not be able to type out "you".