> What this technocratic language stated, in effect, was that anything without a price tag – including the environment, peace and unpaid domestic work – was con

> What this technocratic language stated, in effect, was that anything without a price tag – including the environment, peace and unpaid domestic work – was considered to be of little value to a nation’s economy. Why is this attributed to males? Whats up with the current meme of forcefully interpreting existing systems as "male" and proposing "female" systems as solutions to this? Its like some people got glasses on their head that divide the whole world in either male or female, regardless of whether it makes sense or not. This is some oddball kind of sexism and i don't like it.