5 ms·
I too am salty about this, but the W3C uses IRC for discussions and have no easy forum or boards for RFCs (like TC39 with their use of GitHub for ECMAScript pro
by apatheticonion 4y ago
I too am salty about this, but the W3C uses IRC for discussions and have no easy forum or boards for RFCs (like TC39 with their use of GitHub for ECMAScript proposals).
Contributing to web standards is not really accessible and that contributes to this Chromium-centric world.
- rachelandrew 4y agoThe CSS Working Group uses GitHub primarily, and any minutes from IRC are added to the issue. Here: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues You are very welcome to contribute!
- seba_dos1 4y agoWhat kind of chat would be more accessible than IRC?
- frosted-flakes 4y agoWhat kind of chat wouldn't be more accessible than IRC?
- greggman3 4y ago> Contributing to web standards is not really accessible How so? AFAICT if you want to contribute just go contribute. It's open to all. Discussions are had on public mailing lists, github, etc... Here's one place to start https://github.com/w3c https://github.com/w3c
- apatheticonion 4y agoWhere would one raise a proposal for something like adding a `sandbox` flag to `<script>` elements, the proposal of adding a feature like a "Context Menu API" for PWAs or discussions around pro-privacy features?