3 ms·
I suspect something was miscommunicated to you somewhere, and, as a to-be-former community resident, I would like to apologize for that. I'm not what one'd des
by boneitis 4y ago
I suspect something was miscommunicated to you somewhere, and, as a to-be-former community resident, I would like to apologize for that.
I'm not what one'd describe as holding my breath over what's happening, but I'd like to do what I can to prevent this from unduly disrupting my anonymous-to-me companion's campaign.
While the monthly membership fee is actually a little higher than you remember, all the classes I've taken were either $20 or $40, and probably $60 today; I just haven't taken any recently.
I just asked the front desk. Our priciest equipment class is/was [e: less than half the aforementioned figure] for a two-hour session for members.
- YeBanKo 4y agoOk, [e: less than half the aforementioned figure] is <$150, then maybe that specific machine required multiple classes?
- boneitis 4y agoMaybe. Hell, maybe 300 was the non-member rate, and maybe there was a misunderstanding somewhere. Anyway, as far as the campaign (that I'm otherwise not involved in) for something dearest to me goes, I mainly took issue with the misleading implication of the these statements placed together (and thank you for asking for clarification in a sibling post): > [M]ost of the equipment required an additional course just to use specific equipment. Those courses were $300[.]