The slow async process of scientific progress. The assertions I've imagined would be among the innovative papers on the established papers values. One outcome

The slow async process of scientific progress. The assertions I've imagined would be among the innovative papers on the established papers values. One outcome is that this would strongly encourage fitting in and discourage innovation and disruption. It could discourage publishers from correcting a past error even stronger? So I'm not sure if I like the idea at all to be honest. Let's keep it uninvented as it is.