3 ms·
I think my original language was unclear. Let me rephrase it to: It's a prudent assumption for an educated buyer to expect a lock feature that was unlocked acci
by bgirard 4y ago
I think my original language was unclear. Let me rephrase it to: It's a prudent assumption for an educated buyer to expect a lock feature that was unlocked accidentally to become locked again later knowing companies like Tesla and their customer service track record.
I agree that Tesla taking it away after a long period of time is unreasonable.
- thfuran 4y agoWhy should they assume that it was unlocked accidentally?
- bgirard 4y agoI'm not saying they should assume. I'm stating that if the seller clearly knew, then it should be represent correctly at the time of the sale.
- dagss 4y agoI still disagree about your main point. Even the existence of software controlled lock features is not something that most people will even know about. I would say this stuff is "arcane knowledge for geeks", not "prudent assumption". Not all Tesla customers work as programmers or have read up in Tesla forums on the internet.