4 ms·
"because....that's what it is" I think this is the key problem here. Tesla is asserting the right to decide for the owner what the car "is". Kinda brings into
by tj-teej 4y ago
"because....that's what it is"
I think this is the key problem here. Tesla is asserting the right to decide for the owner what the car "is". Kinda brings into question who the "owner" "is"...
- hef19898 4y agoIf something runs software that either isn't air gapped, eg. cars, or that can recwived forced updates, e.g. OTA updates, obviously the person buying the device is not the owner. Legally for sure you are the owner, in oractical terms less so. And in case of cars, even if the embedded software is air-gaped, if you cannot choose your garage (liscensed garages may perform software uodates wothout you knowing) you kind of loose some "ownership" as well.