5 ms·
Google: Total Rev: 70B, ads:57B, cloud 6B. Amazon: Total rev: 116B Ads: 31B cloud:71B It's reasonable to say that Google's biggest threat is Amazon's ad bus
by lifeisstillgood 4y ago
Google:
Total Rev: 70B, ads:57B, cloud 6B.
Amazon:
Total rev: 116B Ads: 31B cloud:71B
It's reasonable to say that Google's biggest threat is Amazon's ad business. And instagrams not far behind.
- adam_arthur 4y agoAren't Amazon ads just sellers prioritizing their listing on the Amazon page? Seems totally different from the ad market for Google
- xyzzyz 4y agoAren't Google ads just businesses prioritizing their listings on Google search page?
- adam_arthur 4y agoWho will advertise a concert or any various services on Amazon? Or a restaurant? A conference? Very niche focus for Amazon vs broader set of customers for Google ads. Seems totally different to me
- kevinsundar 4y agoEcommerce sellers have higher margins (gross margin 40%) than the other services and businesses you mentioned. So they have more money to spend on Ads. Also Google competes with FB and has to split the advertising pie for those other services and businesses. Amazon owns basically the whole pie for the people who want to advertise products.
- adam_arthur 4y agoE-commerce has terrible margins Amazon itself had negative operating margins for its retail business last quarter. Amazon retail: "Its U.S. segment recorded $206 million in operating losses, while the international side lost $1.63 billion." Single digit margins at best, once a market is competitive. Edit: You edited your above, but gross margin is meaningless. It doesn't even include salaries for employees or infrastructure costs. Net margins for retail will always be slim, outside of specific first mover advantage in some subsectors. You think the Chinese companies selling $5 rubber spatulas are making 40% margins? Lol, try 5% or less. The theory that Amazon retail would grow revenues rapidly and then eventually expand to high operating margins will never come to fruition. Margins will be below 10% in perpetuity But sure, ignore all costs of running the business and look at gross margins.
- kevinsundar 4y agoA quick search says 40% gross margins for e-commerce. So Income - COGS. Which is pretty damn high. Most of these sellers are selling cheap Chinese goods so I bet it's even higher on Amazon. And Amazon retail margins is way different and in no way comparable to SELLER margins.
- londons_explore 4y agoAmazon loses money on every sale, yet somehow they are far pricier than ebay (which is profitable), and that is far pricier than aliexpress. A quick sample of like-for-like products shows that typical sale+delivery price on amazon is 30% more than aliexpress and 18% more than ebay. I really don't see how you can charge 30% more than a profit making competitor, sell in larger volume, yet make a loss.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- oezi 4y agoGive it 5 years (3?) and they might just sell many of these. Concert tickets, restaurant bookings/take out aren't so hard to imagine. I think Amazon's ambition is endless.
- vineyardmike 4y agoMany of my Amazon ads are for non products like financial services (specifically Amex)
- stingrae 4y agoNo. They are ads all over the internet through AdSense.
- alecb 4y agoAmazon has a pretty developed video and display advertising market for publishers called Unified Ad Marketplace; for our business, it's typically in second behind AdX/Adsense for revenue and impressions won. That said, I'm not seeing any revenue breakout from Amazon that specifies how much this side of the business makes.
- next_xibalba 4y agoHuh? Isn't the ecomm component of Amazon's "Total Rev" several hundred billion?
- HeyItsMatt 4y agoCOGS is >70% of that number. Retailers typically subtract it before calculating gross margins.
- next_xibalba 4y agoSure but we're talking revenue, not gross margins.
- abledon 4y agoAmazon has PrimeVideo, BlueOrigin, Trucking Fleets etc... so diverse. What is google doing with all the cash its sitting on? Is Waymo their only bet? They definitely aren't innovating with youtube, 3rd rate copycat features like 'shorts' etc... poor livestreaming/chat design. Maybe they'll just end up buying rocketlab for their space project ...
- open1414 4y agohttps://www.vox.com/new-money/2017/4/19/15357290/juicero-400-machine-hands https://www.vox.com/new-money/2017/4/19/15357290/juicero-400...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- rohitnair 4y agoBlue Origin is not part of Amazon.
- abledon 4y agoOk technically yes, but their IP is probably shared. For instance, Elon Musk has mentioned the Materials Science team he has works for all 3 companies Tesla,SpaceX,BoringCompany etc...
- londons_explore 4y agoThere are close Google <=> SpaceX links too... The Starlink backbone network uses Google Cloud features that appear custom built/aren't available even to big customers. Nearly all Tesla tech seems built on top of Google tech - for example they use various private maps API's for the in-car map display. And everything is built on top of protocol buffers, google's in-house RPC/serialization format.
- donalhunt 4y ago
- jsnell 4y agoYour Amazon ads / AWS numbers look annual, the other numbers quarterly. Just what kind of conclusion are we supposed to draw from that?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- nym375 4y agoI think you might be mixing quarterly and yearly numbers.
- BlackJack 4y agoAmazon Ads 31B is an annual figure. Last quarter it was ~8B. Same thing with cloud; AWS pulled ~18B last quarter. Amazon Ads is a legit threat to Google, especially with product searches. Instagram struggles to monetize commercial queries to the same degree as Goog/Amzn.
- impulser_ 4y agoI think Google is more of a threat to Amazon than Amazon is a threat to Google. Google Shopping and YouTube Shopping are going to eat away at Amazon being the go to place to do product searches.
- spiantino 4y agoHere are accurate numbers: Google Q2: 70B, ads: 57B, cloud 6B. Net profit: $16B Amazon Q1: 117B, ads: 8B, cloud 18B. Net profit: -$4B
- lifeisstillgood 4y agoOK - at 1am I should still do better data checking - apologies please ignore the whole thing