4 ms·
I honestly want to see this taken to court, it would be an interesting case. I mean I'm not convinced at all what Tesla did is even lawful. To me, it seems li
by faeriechangling 4y ago
I honestly want to see this taken to court, it would be an interesting case.
I mean I'm not convinced at all what Tesla did is even lawful. To me, it seems like Tesla and the owner came to a mutual agreement repairing warranty service years earlier, and Tesla's only real arguments is that that either the customer agreed to the downgrade happening eventually (probably not true) or that they didn't understand they were giving the customer all this capacity (maybe?), but I don't think that in turn gives them the right to sabotage a car arbitrarily without notice to remediate this. I think they have an obligation to restore the status quo before the sabotage.
- sacrosancty 4y agoI wonder who the parties would be. Perhaps the current owner's claim should be against the person who sold it to them as a 90, and that person against their seller, and that original owner against Tesla?