maybe I'm just very different from the target audience, but this article seems to run through a load of viewpoints that just don't make any sense. why on earth

maybe I'm just very different from the target audience, but this article seems to run through a load of viewpoints that just don't make any sense. why on earth would you feel stupid for making the conscious decision to switch to a less distracting phone? who has this fear of phone dumbness that the article is talking about? it seems like an issue invented (by the author) through the semantics of the words dumb and smart. yes, some people may have social fomo, but that's not the fear of being some kind of luddite I also completely disagree that it's a cop-out for a dumb phone to have genuinely useful features like maps, music and taxis - things you might have anyway in physical form