3 ms·
Before 2019, they were hesitant to do so over uncertainty as to whether it would be a violation of common carrier laws to do so. https://www.reuters.com/article
by paulgb 4y ago
Before 2019, they were hesitant to do so over uncertainty as to whether it would be a violation of common carrier laws to do so. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-robocalls/fcc-set-to-let-phone-companies-block-more-robocalls-idUSKCN1SL1CC https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-robocalls/fcc-set-to-...
- saghm 4y agoOkay, and in the three years since then, have they made any progress? If not, why am I wrong if I think they may have just been using that as an excuse?
- pkaye 4y agoThey have implemented the shake and stir protocol in the US.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoEasy solution where that's not an issue. Add an abuse button to the phone. Every call costs a dollar to connect, no matter where it comes from - another carrier or international or whatever. You get the dollar back if the receiver doesn't press the abuse button. The dollar can be waived if the company knows the call is coming from an individual household with low call volume.