4 ms·
As a rule, when interviewing, I want to get to the boundary of a candidate's knowledge quickly. Questions they ace provide not much information (once it is esta
by FabHK 4y ago
As a rule, when interviewing, I want to get to the boundary of a candidate's knowledge quickly. Questions they ace provide not much information (once it is established that they ace them), questions where they're totally out of their depth neither.
A bit provides maximum information when the chances for 0/1 are fifty/fifty.
So, agree with the sentiment
> a good interview puts you in a position where you are struggling and out of your expertise
as long as you are still at the boundary of your expertise, and have a realistic chance to make some progress.
- Ntrails 4y ago> Questions they ace provide not much information (once it is established that they ace them), questions where they're totally out of their depth neither. Agreed. The aim, for me, is to watch someone (try to) solve a problem and communicate about it. Ideally I'd like the question to rely on some previously unknown concept to see them pick up a new idea and run with it.