3 ms·

The links on the page seem broken, I did quick hunt around to get this better central link: https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/poplog/freepoplog.html

by olliej 4y ago

The links on the page seem broken, I did quick hunt around to get this better central link: https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/poplog/freepoplog.html https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/poplog/freepoplo... Or direct to the primer: https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/poplog/primer/ https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/poplog/primer/ Both of which seem like they are more reliable

jimbob45 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POP-11 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POP-11 was helpful for me as well
user00012-ab 4y ago
This confused me in many ways; 1) why did someone submit a site that was mostly broken and really didn't show what pop-11 was or looked like, and 2) why did it trend to the front page at all? Why do people on this site keep pushing sites that are just broken. I really wish there was an automatic down-voting of people that submit sites that are broken, pay-walled, or break the browser in some new and fun way.