4 ms·
The opposite--- they are effectively covering for each other. They (the orgs, more generally) are complicit in allowing this dysfunctional rent-seeking monopoly
by prvc 4y ago
The opposite--- they are effectively covering for each other. They (the orgs, more generally) are complicit in allowing this dysfunctional rent-seeking monopoly to continue and expand. This was a political failure long before before the "coding error" took place.
- j_not_j 4y ago"Canadian telecoms resiliency working group" It is ineffective. Their remit includes "architecture" but the Rogers network architecture is a clear failure. There was no political will to evaluate the results of such a group.