based on the comments from alzforum, the relevant academics do not see this as 16 years of research in the wrong direction. they seem to see it as an invalidati

based on the comments from alzforum, the relevant academics do not see this as 16 years of research in the wrong direction. they seem to see it as an invalidation of one branch of the research, while the overarching theory is still intact the cynic in me suspects that they're saying that to maintain their - presumably funded - status quo, but not being even remotely knowledgeable in the subject, I have no idea whether that is well-founded