4 ms·
How long from now are you talking about? Eyeballing it, I think it would take us about a thousand years to get off by an hour?
by jefftk 4y ago
How long from now are you talking about? Eyeballing it, I think it would take us about a thousand years to get off by an hour?
- balefrost 4y agoIn the worst case, you would get 2 leap seconds per year. So in the worst case, 1800 years. However, in the past 50 years, we've only had 27. So at the current rate, probably more like 6667 years to be off by an hour. Of course, if the earth's rotation changed speed by so much that 2 leap seconds per year wasn't enough, we'd find a way to cram more in. In fact, in that case, the case for leap seconds would probably get stronger.
- furyofantares 4y agoI would absolutely take the cost of work schedules being adjusted by an hour once every 6667 years over the cost of 6667 years of programmers having to deal with leap seconds and everyone else having to deal with the fallout of any bugs from that. How long has the 9-5 even existed? Less than 200 years? At no point in 6667 years would anyone notice any consequences of the drift, culture and work schedules change so much faster than that.
- throw0101a 4y ago> How long from now are you talking about? Eyeballing it, I think it would take us about a thousand years to get off by an hour? The Julian calendar being off with regards to leap years wasn't a problem… until it was. And then someone had to fix it: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar