3 ms·
Solution was discussed on HN the other day. The process by which we displace putting more carbon in the air is quite well understood and will be economically vi
by Beltiras 4y ago
Solution was discussed on HN the other day. The process by which we displace putting more carbon in the air is quite well understood and will be economically viable if we can bring down and scale up energy production, cost by a little, production by a lot. The article talked about solar but I'd put my money on molten salt reactors for the energy production.
- jeffbee 4y agoIf you want to make that bet the world has provided you ample opportunities. https://www.google.com/finance/quote/GE:NYSE?comparison=SHE%3A002459&window=5Y https://www.google.com/finance/quote/GE:NYSE?comparison=SHE%... A faster way would be to just light the money on fire, though.
- hcarvalhoalves 4y agoIt is unlikely miraculous new technology alone will solve anything. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebound_effect_(conservation) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebound_effect_(conservation)
- Beltiras 4y agoMSRs are neither new nor miraculous.
- eikenberry 4y agoSounds like this means it solved the problem of there not being enough of it being to expensive. The rebound effect doesn't mean it doesn't solve problems, it means you misunderstood the problem.