3 ms·

Thanks for the summary, I popped in just for that. I got intrigued though, and indeed you can read the thing both ways: an optimization gave a 100% boost, or a

Thanks for the summary, I popped in just for that. I got intrigued though, and indeed you can read the thing both ways: an optimization gave a 100% boost, or an oversight missed out a 100% boost. Curiously, Tom’s went with the scare tactic, and got me thinking: is it because clickbait, or do they consciously support the responsibility in software engineering movement?

fluidcruft 4y ago
I think it's just the general trend of portraying intel as incompetent (particularly in GPU).
Marsymars 4y ago
> I got intrigued though, and indeed you can read the thing both ways: an optimization gave a 100% boost, or an oversight missed out a 100% boost. To note; a 100× speed up is a 9900% boost. A 100% boost is a 2× speed up.