I particularly like this bit: > The MIT License unquestionably has an express [patent] license. That license is not limited to the granting of any particular f

I particularly like this bit: > The MIT License unquestionably has an express [patent] license. That license is not limited to the granting of any particular flavor of intellectual property rights. The statement of license does not use the word "patent" or the word "copyright." When was the last time you heard someone expressing concern that the MIT License merely had an implied copyright license?