3 ms·
> So it's not only about robustness vs efficiency, but also about additional factors like ownership and freedom + security et cetera. Id argue those are part o
by blamestross 4y ago
> So it's not only about robustness vs efficiency, but also about additional factors like ownership and freedom + security et cetera.
Id argue those are part of centralization vs decentralization
Plenty of systems that look decentralized at first glance really just have human organization as the central failure point. This is a great example of why most cryptocurrency is centralized (centralized development and management)
- jedimind 4y agoOne can always infinitely shift the goal post and nitpick if one has an axe to grind. The point is aiming for as little or as much decentralization possible to realize certain properties, it's not about having decentralization for the sake of decentralization. it's not a goal but a means to an end. we fundamentally want more ownership, freedom & security. Priorities are also important: Unrealistic levels of decentralization make no sense before securing survival and increased usage. In addition, we don't need absolutely everything to be decentralized, but merely those components that help us manifest those properties we desire.