5 ms·
>Imagine each consumer having to maintain relationships with ... tens of farmers Farmers' markets are great.
by jollyllama 4y ago
>Imagine each consumer having to maintain relationships with ... tens of farmers
Farmers' markets are great.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jasode 4y ago>Farmers' markets are great. Fyi if you didn't already know... the farmers' markets are themselves a type of middlemen. (At least every one I've shopped at in the USA.) The farmers' market rents out the booth spaces to vendors (farmers). It's a real-world "platform" to bring together buyers and sellers. The farmers' cost to rent the space is embedded into the prices the consumers pay. A true individual relationship with a farmer would be something like driving to Joel Salatin's Polyface Farms and buying broiler chickens directly from him. This bypasses the middlemen of farmers' markets.
- jollyllama 4y agoThat's true. The farmers' market also acts as a advertising for that kind of direct relationship. Most of the vendors have cards with links or phone numbers where you can arrange that kind of thing, or even deliveries. I'd say the difference is the farmers' market allows for that, whereas at a grocery store I'm usually buying products labelled states away, if they even are from a farmer you could ever buy direct from at all.
- clairity 4y ago> "...like driving to Joel Salatin's Polyface Farms and buying broiler chickens directly from him." reading omnivore's dilemma when it came out impulsively made me want to do that, but of course the impracticality of that quickly dawned on me. it's similarly why reading a book is a better than going and getting first-hand accounts for all our information. we've created socioeconomic structures for very good reasons, so we shouldn't want to burn them down for the tradeoffs, but rather we should address the negatives directly.
- rcoder 4y agoWe get about 2/3rds of our produce from a CSA (community-supported agriculture) share each week. The farmer drops off a load of whatever's ready to eat that week, and the members show up and take home their portion of what's there. From a "commercial marketplace" POV, it's basically a farce. There's no security -- it's literally just a folding table full of food on someone's porch with a clipboard to mark that you've taken your share for the week -- and the supply varies with the weather, crop conditions, and even mundane things like "the delivery truck broke down this week; shares will be small and/or late." And yet: everyone gets fed, the farmer gets paid, and it all ends up being price-competitive with a grocery store (much less a farmer's market). We also patronize a farmer's market for the "showcase" products that succeed there: big pretty loaves of bread, flats of fruit, etc. It's still cheaper than any high-end grocery store, the shelf life is amazing b/c it hasn't traveled 1000 miles on a truck, and we get to interact directly with the folks who make the food. The catch -- and it's a big one, in terms of classic microeconomic indicators -- is that we can't get an arbitrary amount of any chosen good at a competitive price right on the spot. Want peaches, but the stall sold out or bugs got this week's share? Sorry; hope cherries are okay this week. Don't like turnips or beets? Well, you might need to trade with someone who does, or find a new way to prepare 'em. There's also no "economy of scale" to speak of; the largest vendors are probably a couple of bakers who make O(thousands) of loaves per day, or the ranchers and fishermen who show up with coolers full of frozen steaks and fillets (b/c one cow or fishing boat load actually feeds a lot of people). Oh, and basically every farmer's market is also a localized barter economy. If you watch you can see the vendors roaming between stalls, offering trades and samples with other purveyors. After-hours, there are a _lot_ of boxes of food moving from one stall to another just before the left-overs get loaded back into the truck. So yes, strictly speaking these are all "marketplaces". It's a far cry though from Amazon swooping in to undercut the successful products on their own platform, or any major store chain selling shelf space to the highest bidder to create -- rather than respond to -- consumer demand. Obviously it doesn't work for every product or service, but there's definitely a space to accept a little less efficiency in favor of community-level resilience.
- Veen 4y agoBut a marketplace is a classic example of a middle man. They facilitate sales between one group (the farmers) and another group (the buyers). The alternative is every buyer visiting every farm they want to make a purchase from. Farmers markets are a useful example of why middlemen often have a valuable role.
- jollyllama 4y agoI never said they weren't. The takeaway would be middlemen can add different value. In this case the middleman is adding value by opening the door to direct relationships. So it's a gateway. In the case of a supermarket, they're adding something like distribution or logistics.
- uoaei 4y agoYour comment is phrased as if you disagree with a conclusion which I don't believe was posed in the GP.
- zwieback 4y agoFarmers' markets are great, yes, as entertainment for wealthy consumers with spare time, me being one of those. As a sales channel they are extremely inefficient and all told probably bad for the environment.
- 8note 4y agoAs a sales mechanism for CSA boxes they aren't too bad The efficiency is dependent on what you're measuring - food per land area? Food per energy input? Energy output per energy input?
- zwieback 4y agoI was thinking of total energy (and maybe something like CO2) per food on the customer's table, including the waste that's produced.
- mariusor 4y agoFor me personally it doesn't tract that reducing the supply chain between producer and consumer to the maximum will result in more energy expenditure: The supplier has one trip to make to sell their current stock. The consumer has one trip to make to buy multiple items that they're interested in (since this is a market).
- framperz 4y agoGreat quote on that from Vaclav Smil's new book: " each greenhouse-grown, supermarket-bought tomato has the equivalent of five tablespoons of diesel embedded in production"
- dominotw 4y agohere in chicago most of them aren't even farmers. They are just middlemen.
- skippyboxedhero 4y agoIt turns out manufacturing and distribution aren't the same business (food is a perfect example, there are used to be multiple layers of wholesalers, supermarkets took that all away...if you take them away, you get the layers of wholesalers...I will also say, farmer's markets aren't as clean, no-one today knows how unclean food used to be before supermarkets but that is another major reason why they exist). You would have thought that a former policymaker/lobbyist would have known better than the market...he went to Harvard you known. But it turns out that there is a reason why businesses have been organized this way for the past three centuries.
- jeromegv 4y agoSomehow people expect to buy straight from the farmers at the farmers market located in the downtown of a large city, ignoring the fact that the farmers do need to.. farm their land. Traveling with their goods back and forth within the city isn't really an efficient use of their time.
- dominotw 4y agowell if its called 'farmers market' then that's the assumption. Should be called 'random market' otherwise.
- rahimnathwani 4y agoI grew up near a 'random' fresh produce market called 'Balham market'. It's since been renamed 'Hildreth Street Market' and, according to Time Out, it's "blossoming into a foodie’s paradise".