4 ms·
Unfortunately it's more common than you think... I remember this case in particular from some years ago: https://www.legalreader.com/st-jude-medical-files-laws
by pjbk 4y ago
Unfortunately it's more common than you think... I remember this case in particular from some years ago:
https://www.legalreader.com/st-jude-medical-files-lawsuit-against-medsec-and-muddy-waters/ https://www.legalreader.com/st-jude-medical-files-lawsuit-ag...
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> Unfortunately it's more common Why is calling out fraud unfortunate? With respect to St. Jude, Muddy Waters was at least partially right [1]. [1] https://www.hipaajournal.com/fda-confirms-muddy-waters-claims-st-jude-medical-devices-can-hacked-8642/ https://www.hipaajournal.com/fda-confirms-muddy-waters-claim...
- DiggyJohnson 4y agoPresumably GP is not saying that the calling out of fraud is unfortunate, but that the fraud itself is unfortunate.
- pjbk 4y agoPrecisely, sorry if it was not clear enough. Pointing vulnerabilities and betting on the side to effectively become a stakeholder raises some concerns on your true intentions, even if it could be legal to do so.