3 ms·

I'll agree that there's quite a bit of junk punctuation in the extracted sentences (and sentence fragments), quite often from short footnotes in the Wiki articl

I'll agree that there's quite a bit of junk punctuation in the extracted sentences (and sentence fragments), quite often from short footnotes in the Wiki articles. Getting "good" PDFs with open usage rights was a bit tricky, especially in a super simple PDF format. I ended up PDF-printing from Chrome. Needless to say, working with PDFs makes me want to pull my hair out. I also ended up writing the SpacySentencizer Executor instead of using a "vanilla" sentencizer. That led to consistent sentence splitting (so "J.R.R. Tolkien turned to pg. 3" would be one sentence, not 5) For testing, Jina allows you to swap out encoders with just a couple of lines of code, so trying different methods out should work just fine.

PaulHoule 4y ago
I dunno, you can download a million or so PDFs from arxiv.org and even more from archive.org. They aren't hard to find. There is something to say for roundtripping PDFs from source you control (you can accurately model the corruption produced by a particular system) but you will certainly see new and different phenomena if you try more. I'd agree that spacy's sentence segmentation is better than many of the alternatives.
- alexcg1 4y ago
  If new and different phenomena means new kinds of corruption and downright weird behavior I'll end up having no hair left! Even printing the same page to PDF with Chrome and Firefox delivers quite different results. Firefox was often combining "f" and "i" into ﬁ ligature [0] which totally changed the meaning of "finished" for example. Downloading a lot of random PDFs from arxiv would be great for making something battle-hardened and robust (and I'd love to get the chance to do it sometime) but I didn't have the time (or the remaining hair) to do it this time round. [0] https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+FB01 https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+FB01
- alexcg1 4y ago
  And +1 to spaCy. I typically use it over Transformers because it's SO much faster. I just used Transformers in this example for a change. My Stack Overflow search notebook [0] uses spaCy. [0] https://colab.research.google.com/github/jina-ai/workshops/blob/main/stack_overflow/stack_overflow.ipynb https://colab.research.google.com/github/jina-ai/workshops/b...

PaulHoule 4y ago

I dunno, you can download a million or so PDFs from arxiv.org and even more from archive.org. They aren't hard to find. There is something to say for roundtripping PDFs from source you control (you can accurately model the corruption produced by a particular system) but you will certainly see new and different phenomena if you try more. I'd agree that spacy's sentence segmentation is better than many of the alternatives.

alexcg1 4y ago
If new and different phenomena means new kinds of corruption and downright weird behavior I'll end up having no hair left! Even printing the same page to PDF with Chrome and Firefox delivers quite different results. Firefox was often combining "f" and "i" into ﬁ ligature [0] which totally changed the meaning of "finished" for example. Downloading a lot of random PDFs from arxiv would be great for making something battle-hardened and robust (and I'd love to get the chance to do it sometime) but I didn't have the time (or the remaining hair) to do it this time round. [0] https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+FB01 https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+FB01
alexcg1 4y ago
And +1 to spaCy. I typically use it over Transformers because it's SO much faster. I just used Transformers in this example for a change. My Stack Overflow search notebook [0] uses spaCy. [0] https://colab.research.google.com/github/jina-ai/workshops/blob/main/stack_overflow/stack_overflow.ipynb https://colab.research.google.com/github/jina-ai/workshops/b...