>The attack was so meticulously planned. How could that be the work of an insane person? This could easily be turned on the owner. "The house was so meticulous

>The attack was so meticulously planned. How could that be the work of an insane person? This could easily be turned on the owner. "The house was so meticulously planned. How could that be the work of an insane person?" The thing I see in this article is two people whose actions are rational given a belief in a collapse. It's the belief in the collapse that's insane. Of course the owner doesn't see the attacker as insane. They share the same premise. The attacker talked of building a bunker and the CIA tracking him. "[The owner] instead speculated about political forces that might have it in for him and his family. He talked about hired assassins and past C.I.A. experiments with brainwashing, and suggested that a violent attack on the home of a Second Amendment champion like himself had all the signs of an operation to justify more gun control." This is so blatant, it simply must be the point of the article.