6 ms·
The title is a bit inaccurate to the article content. Has some new finding truly un-done past findings in astronomy? How has it been reshaped? I'm as excited as
by beanjuice 4y ago
The title is a bit inaccurate to the article content. Has some new finding truly un-done past findings in astronomy? How has it been reshaped? I'm as excited as anyone about what JW can provide, but it is just a new era in addition, not exception- as even the article puts it.
- bowsamic 4y ago[deleted]
- danijar 4y agoTo me, that's just bad scientific reporting then. As a scientist, I also found this headline a bit misleading.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- 93po 4y agoAll science reporting is bad. All of it.
- replygirl 4y agoreshaping is beat-agnostic clickbait for "doing some interesting stuff". plug "reshaping" into a google news search
- throwaway4220 4y agoTo me it’s like when they say xy stock plummets (by 5%)
- prewett 4y agoHeh, I'd be fine with that. Usually it's "XY plummets because of ... (XY: -1%)". From my non-statistically informed observations, 1% is basically the noise floor, so saying "because" is misleading at best. At least 5% is pretty rare.
- koheripbal 4y agoThere have also not yet been any significant new findings. The article is pure fluff.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dotnet00 4y agoIt's not super groundbreaking yet (given how early it is), but the oldest galaxies seen in the JWST deep field apparently seem to be more structured than expected for such a young universe, which would probably require revision of our models of the young universe.