In my experience most dark sky advocacy comes from the work of scientists who agree that artificial light is great, but it can be even better (for health, safet

In my experience most dark sky advocacy comes from the work of scientists who agree that artificial light is great, but it can be even better (for health, safety, environment, etc.) if you only use it when you need it, and you only point it where it needs to go. That’s basically the core of the argument. Hope I helped shed more light on the topic for you!