> Why try to compete with Rust while not really being a better Rust? The linked article explains this: classes defined in C++ can be used in Carbon and vice-v

> Why try to compete with Rust while not really being a better Rust? The linked article explains this: classes defined in C++ can be used in Carbon and vice-versa. It even suggests you stick to Rust if that's not what you need. Edit: Oops, I assumed that the "linked article" was the github page[1] for Carbon, which is a lot more useful. [1] https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang#why-build-carbon https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang#why-build-car...