3 ms·

https://archive.ph/rkPlg https://archive.ph/rkPlg Moral of the story: Don't piss off the establishment politicians, or bad shit is likely to happen to you and

https://archive.ph/rkPlg https://archive.ph/rkPlg Moral of the story: Don't piss off the establishment politicians, or bad shit is likely to happen to you and yours.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
jaclaz 4y ago
>Moral of the story: Don't piss off the establishment politicians, or bad shit is likely to happen to you and yours. I think you read another article, someone with mental problems broke into a house and killed one of the occupants. The house was famous because it was advertised for sale on Zillow and for some reasons, since it had a 3,000,000 US$ nuclear shelter, it became viral. Allegedly the killer wanted to access this bunker "so that he could secure it for himself and his family and friends". These are the reported facts, the rest is either embellishments by the New York Times or sort of conspiracy theories by the owner[0], who was a former member of the Kentucky House of Representatives. When/if some actual proof of the killing being originated by his previous political activity will come out, then there will be something to believe your "moral of the story". [0] from the article: How could that be the work of an insane person? he asked. He instead speculated about political forces that might have it in for him and his family. He talked about hired assassins and past C.I.A. experiments with brainwashing, and suggested that a violent attack on the home of a Second Amendment champion like himself had all the signs of an operation to justify more gun control.
- aradox66 4y ago
  "Sponsoring gun violence to shadow promote gun control" is an amazing conspiracy theory.
secretsatan 4y ago
Well, if you think like that, everything will confirm it. One guy believed civilisation was going to end and built themselves a bunker, some other guy believes the same thing who doesn't have a bunker, and has easy access to guns, because society is going to collapse and everyone needs to protect themselves, decides to take one by force. I see a common thread here, but it's not establishment politicians.

https://archive.ph/rkPlg https://archive.ph/rkPlg Moral of the story: Don't piss off the establishment politicians, or bad shit is likely to happen to you and yours.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

jaclaz 4y ago

>Moral of the story: Don't piss off the establishment politicians, or bad shit is likely to happen to you and yours. I think you read another article, someone with mental problems broke into a house and killed one of the occupants. The house was famous because it was advertised for sale on Zillow and for some reasons, since it had a 3,000,000 US$ nuclear shelter, it became viral. Allegedly the killer wanted to access this bunker "so that he could secure it for himself and his family and friends". These are the reported facts, the rest is either embellishments by the New York Times or sort of conspiracy theories by the owner[0], who was a former member of the Kentucky House of Representatives. When/if some actual proof of the killing being originated by his previous political activity will come out, then there will be something to believe your "moral of the story". [0] from the article: How could that be the work of an insane person? he asked. He instead speculated about political forces that might have it in for him and his family. He talked about hired assassins and past C.I.A. experiments with brainwashing, and suggested that a violent attack on the home of a Second Amendment champion like himself had all the signs of an operation to justify more gun control.

aradox66 4y ago
"Sponsoring gun violence to shadow promote gun control" is an amazing conspiracy theory.

secretsatan 4y ago

Well, if you think like that, everything will confirm it. One guy believed civilisation was going to end and built themselves a bunker, some other guy believes the same thing who doesn't have a bunker, and has easy access to guns, because society is going to collapse and everyone needs to protect themselves, decides to take one by force. I see a common thread here, but it's not establishment politicians.