3 ms·
>What would be the reason for using "lsd" instead of popular IETF RFCs? Maybe due to the following? >This specification was developed outside the IETF and doe
by forgotpwd16 4y ago
>What would be the reason for using "lsd" instead of popular IETF RFCs?
Maybe due to the following?
>This specification was developed outside the IETF and does not have IETF consensus.
- capableweb 4y agoMost RFCs start without consensus as well, that's why they are Request For Comments, to reconcile about the idea/specification
- schanzen 4y agoThis sentence is usually added for specifications which are submitted independently to the Independent Stream Editor, as opposed to drafts which are discussed in a WG at IETF.