5 ms·
RFC-style spec is at https://lsd.gnunet.org/lsd0001/ https://lsd.gnunet.org/lsd0001/
by prognu 4y ago
RFC-style spec is at https://lsd.gnunet.org/lsd0001/ https://lsd.gnunet.org/lsd0001/
- hericium 4y agoJust came here with the same link in my clipboard and a question: What would be the reason for using "lsd" instead of popular IETF RFCs? The fact that RFC is supposed to open a dialogue/discussion and "lsd" is something final? (edit: it isn't; it's a IETF-style Internet-Draft). Other LSDs on that site link to RFCs. And, um, second question: what does "lsd" stand for in this case?
- forgotpwd16 4y ago>What would be the reason for using "lsd" instead of popular IETF RFCs? Maybe due to the following? >This specification was developed outside the IETF and does not have IETF consensus.
- capableweb 4y agoMost RFCs start without consensus as well, that's why they are Request For Comments, to reconcile about the idea/specification
- schanzen 4y agoThis sentence is usually added for specifications which are submitted independently to the Independent Stream Editor, as opposed to drafts which are discussed in a WG at IETF.
- junon 4y agoI can't find much on what "LSD" means here. The root of the subdomain has no index, just a file listing.
- schanzen 4y agoIt stands for "Living Standards Document": https://www.gnunet.org/en/livingstandards.html https://www.gnunet.org/en/livingstandards.html
- schanzen 4y agoIt is also currently in the "final" phases of a RFC publication (Indepdendent Stream, Informational): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schanzen-gns/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schanzen-gns/