3 ms·
I have to agree with you on this one. Yes Ros looks hood on paper but the moment you open it, it just screams academia and academics. Also yes FPGA is faster
by thendrill 4y ago
I have to agree with you on this one.
Yes Ros looks hood on paper but the moment you open it, it just screams academia and academics.
Also yes FPGA is faster for in general. But who is gonna program it ?
- vmayoral 4y agoMove to ROS 2 :)! Regarding who's going to create the accelerators, enablers like this allow any ROSser to jump into creating their own accelerator from C++ by purely adding some metadata into their CMakeLists.txt files (which every ROS package has already). On top of that, organizations are creating professional-grade kernels meant for production. NVIDIA and AMD are investing in that direction and so are we at Acceleration Robotics. Here're a few of the first ones announced: - Accelerated perception stack (ROS 2 API-compatible) https://accelerationrobotics.com/robotcore-perception.php https://accelerationrobotics.com/robotcore-perception.php - Accelerated coordinate system transformation (ROS 2 API-compatible, tf2) https://accelerationrobotics.com/robotcore-transform.php https://accelerationrobotics.com/robotcore-transform.php