2 ms·
Because: - UX is important to the average software developer - UX within popular email clients targeting the task of code review is non-existent - UX within
by lucideer 4y ago
Because:
- UX is important to the average software developer
- UX within popular email clients targeting the task of code review is non-existent
- UX within IDEs for code review is better but: (a) send-email integrations are less polished/mature than they could be (largely due to the dominance of PR/MR flows) and (b) IDE code-review UX is still, despite everything, lagging Web UI code review UX
TL;DR: open distributed specs are what we need ideally, but you can't escape the fact that they'll always need much more work to overcome feature inconsistency and niche uses
---
I'm really rooting for sourcehut in this battle as I think if it got some adoption we could start seeing improvements to the above problems (they're all surmountable), but I think the biggest thing that's going to help that adoption is sourcehut adding a (good) web UI for their flow, per https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/lists.sr.ht/111 https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/lists.sr.ht/111
- girvo 4y ago> (b) IDE code-review UX is still, despite everything, lagging Web UI code review UX This can't be overstated. Visual Studio Code seems to be making moves in this direction at least, but then again it's GitHub specific I believe?