4 ms·
Downvoters aside, it isn't at all out of the question. From http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/privacy/Privacy_R2d_Torts_Sections.htm http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/pri
by vannevar 15y ago
Downvoters aside, it isn't at all out of the question. From http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/privacy/Privacy_R2d_Torts_Sections.htm http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/privacy/Privacy_R2d_Torts_Secti... :
"One who intentionally intrudes, physically or otherwise, upon the solitude or seclusion of another or his private affairs or concerns, is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. " (emphasis added)
- tedunangst 15y agoI have a hard time believing that the tweeter intruded into the couple's business. If anything, the couple intruded into his solitude.