4 ms·
> This degrades the developer experience regardless of how cheap compute and storage are. I would argue that if you only have one good tool to do something, yo
by hatware 4y ago
> This degrades the developer experience regardless of how cheap compute and storage are.
I would argue that if you only have one good tool to do something, you have an opportunity to make much better tools for that something.
It's not docker's job to be better than Makefile with every use-case. You do realize what you're asking for here right? It's impossible. No tool is perfect for every use-case.
- yjftsjthsd-h 4y ago> It's not docker's job to be better than Makefile with every use-case. You do realize what you're asking for here right? It's impossible. No tool is perfect for every use-case. The root of this thread is > We actually use docker multistage build as mentioned here as a replacement for make file. So yes, it absolutely is reasonable to ask that docker, when used in the exact same way as make, should not give us a noticeable performance regression compared to running make.
- pid-1 4y agoDid you even read the article?
- hatware 4y ago345 words is barely an article. What about my comments are off topic exactly...?