> Otherwise it feels a bit ad hoc that way, wouldn't consider a gist with this many files more ergonomic compared to a repository. All gists are actually GitHu

> Otherwise it feels a bit ad hoc that way, wouldn't consider a gist with this many files more ergonomic compared to a repository. All gists are actually GitHub repositories — you can clone them, branch, and commit changes. There isn’t PRs or an issue tracker, though. (Same with GitHub wikis.)