> It found that for women under 35 or over 40, the age of their male partner made little difference to their chances of giving birth. But for women between the

> It found that for women under 35 or over 40, the age of their male partner made little difference to their chances of giving birth. But for women between the ages of 35 and 40, there was a “significant drop” in the live birth rate if the male partner was aged 40 and above. The article itself is telling us that there is no affect to the chance of birth except when the woman is 35–40, in which case it apparently makes a difference. Put another way, "men, it makes no difference except briefly when her age is in this window." ...which it probably actually doesn't.