2 ms·
This was published in 2015, when they thought exactly that. It really seemed like it was almost over, I remember checking the stats every few months hoping for
by ars 4y ago
This was published in 2015, when they thought exactly that. It really seemed like it was almost over, I remember checking the stats every few months hoping for the end.
It failed.
See my post for why it failed (in short: cVDPV2), but this xkcd is no longer correct. And ironically the person we are supposed to be laughing at in the strip, actually turned out to be correct - we need a whole new strategy (which is called nOPV2 if you want to lookup info).